Усманов М. Р. Оценка потенциала системы непрерывных улучшений, как условие инновационного технологического развития систем «Продукт-Производство» // Научное обозрение: теория и практика. 2019. Т. 9. Вып. 10. С. 1496–1510. DOI: 10.35679/2226-0226- 2019-9-10-1496-1510

Усманов Марат Радикович, канд. техн. наук, ООО «ЛУКОЙЛ-Нижегородниинефтепроект»: Россия, 603006, г. Нижний Новгород, ул. Максима Горького, 147А.

Тел.: (831) 422-33-33

E-mail: Usmanov_m_r@mail.ru

1. Parshina A. A., Levchuk V. V., et al. The Study of Modern Approaches to Development of Economic Systems Through Managing Their Complexity. In: The Future of the Global Financial System: Downfall or Harmony. ISC 2018.LectureNotesin NetworksandSystems. – 2019. – Vol. 57. – P. 726-733.

2. Bredillet C. N. Blowing Hot and Cold on Project Management. Project Management Journal, June 2010. – P. 4-20.

3. Browning T. R., Fricke E., Negele H. Key Concepts in Modeling Product Development Processes. Published online in Wiley InterScience. [Электронный ресурс] – Режим доступа: www.interscience.wiley.com. DOI 10.1002/sys.20047.

4. Ren Y. and Yeo K. T. Research challenges on Complex Product Systems Innovation, Journal of the Chinese Institute of Industrial Engineers. – 2006. – No. 23. – P. 519- 529.

5. Davis F. D., and Venkatesh V. A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology acceptance model: Three experiments Internet. J. Human-Comput. Stud, 1996. – P. 19-45.

6. Гарина Е. П. Проектирование условий эффективной организации технологического процесса производительного обслуживания оборудования на предприятиях отрасли // Вестник НГИЭИ. – 2017. – № 1 (68). – С. 91-101.

7. Potashnik Y. S. et al. Determining the value of own investment capital of industrial enterprises. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 622. –2018. – Р. 170-178.

8. Усманов М. Р., Подвинцев И. Б., Гималетдинов Р. Р. Повышение производительности и эффективности эксплуатации производственных активов. Технологическая поддержка предприятий нефтепереработки, нефтехимии и газопереработки. – СПб. : Питер, 2018. – 304 с.

9. Список инструментов Лин Шесть Сигм. [Электронный ресурс] – Режим доступа: http://univerlss.ru/index.php?choose=5&tool=7.

10. Tolstykh T. O., Shkarupeta E. V., et al. Algorithm for Assessing the Efficiency of Innovational Technologies of Industrial Enterprises. In: Emergence, Changes and Future Perspectives. Lecture Notes in Networks andSystems, 2020. Vol. 73. – P. 463-471.

11. Kuznetsov V., et al. Re-engineering the business process of sales in view of life cycle stage and the company organisational structure/International Journal of Trade and Global Markets (IJTGM). – Vol. 12. – No. 3/4. – 2019. – P. 412-423.

12. Integrated product and process design and development–the product realization process, second edition, by E. B. Magrab, S. K. Gupta, F. P. McCluskey and P. Sandborn. [Электронный ресурс] – Режим доступа: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540903482244.

13. Hsin-Hsin Chang. The influence of continuous improvement and performance factors in total quality organization, Total Quality Management. May, 2005. – Vol. 16. – No. 3. – P. 413-437. DOI: 10.1080/14783360500053790.

14. Le Moigne, J.-L. La théorie du système général. Théorie de la modélisation. Presses Universitaires de France, 1990.

DEVELOPMENT OF THE “PRODUCT-PRODUCTION” SYSTEMS

Usmanov Marat Radikovich, Cand. of Tech. Sci., “LUKOIL-Nizhegorodniinefteproekt”, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia.

Keywords: continuous improvement system, management, Lean Six Sigma methodology tools, performance indicators, systems development practice.

Abstract. In the modern world, the introduction of innovations in the mode of continuous improvement is a necessary and indispensable condition for the competitiveness of a Company. Improvements are understood as measures of an organizational or investment nature, aimed at obtaining an economic effect from improving production processes, management and auxiliary business processes, as well as all aspects of the development of systems: corporate, production, product creation. Categorical apparatus on the research topic, possible areas of continuous improvement in the  Company and relevant practices are considered, using the example of the business sector highlighted in the  study, the  potential of the  continuous improvement system is evaluated. Modern hierarchy of systems management in the theory of continuous improvements, a classic model of a system of improvement; attributes determining the  degree of “return” from implementing a system of continuous improvements and the tools used are identified. The object of the research is the “Processing” business sector of the LUKOIL Group. The purpose of the study is to assess the change in the production culture of the Company in the context of forming and implementing a systematic approach to continuous improvement, as well as the conditions for the competencies development and concentration, and experience in implementing tools for continuous improvement systems. These studies allow us to draw conclusions about the effectiveness of the solutions used to ensure innovative technological development of domestic production corporate systems, which is confirmed by a comparison with relevant practices of industry leaders. An assessment of the potential of the  Continuous Improvement System, using the example of the business sector, shows the need to form reserves for the further development of the Company. Conclusion: practical significance of the work lies in the possibility of using the selected solutions as an instrument for effective development management in industrial enterprises and corporate agglomerations. 

REFERENCES

1. Parshina A. A., Levchuk V. V., et al. (2019) The Study of Modern Approaches to Development of Economic Systems Through Managing Their Complexity. The Future of the Global Financial System: Downfall or Harmony. ISC 2018. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 57: 726–733.

2. Bredillet C. N. (2010) Blowing Hot and Cold on Project Management. Project Management Journal, 6: 4–20.

3. Browning T. R., Fricke E., Negele H. (2006) Key Concepts in Modeling Product Development Processes. Wiley InterScience. Available at: www.interscience.wiley.com.

4. Ren Y., Yeo K. T. (2006) Research challenges on Complex Product Systems Innovation. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Industrial Engineers, 23: 519–529.

5. Davis F. D., Venkatesh V. (1996) A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology acceptance model. Three experiments Internet. J. Human-Comput. Stud: 19–45.

6. Garina E. P. (2017) Proyektirovaniye usloviy effektivnoy organizatsii tekhnologicheskogo protsessa proizvoditel’nogo obsluzhivaniya oborudovaniya na predpriyatiyakh otrasli [Designing the conditions for the effective organization of the technological process of productive maintenance of equipment at the enterprises of the industry] Vestnik NGII, 1 (68): 91–101.

7. Potashnik Y. S. et al. (2018) Determining the value of own investment capital of industrial enterprises. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 622: 170–178.

8. Usmanov M. R., Podvintsev I. B., Gimaletdinov R. R. (2018) Povysheniye proizvoditel’nosti i effektivnosti ekspluatatsii proizvodstvennykh aktivov. Tekhnologicheskaya podderzhka predpriyatiy neftepererabotki, neftekhimii i gazopererabotki [Increasing productivity and operating efficiency of production assets. Technological support for oil refineries, petrochemicals and gas refineries]. St. Peterburg, Peter. 304 p.

9. Lin Six Sigm University (2018) Spisok instrumentov Lin Shest’ Sigm [List of Lin Six Sigma tools]. Available at: http://univerlss.ru/index.php?choose=5&tool=7.

10. Tolstykh T. O., Shkarupeta E. V., et al. (2019) Algorithm for Assessing the Efficiency of Innovational Technologies of Industrial Enterprises. Emergence, Changes and Future Perspectives. Lecture Notes in Networks andSystems, 2020, 73: 463–471.

11. Kuznetsov V. et al. (2019) Re-engineering the business process of sales in view of life cycle stage and the company organisational structure. International Journal of Trade and Global Markets (IJTGM), 3/4 (12): 412-423.

12. Magrab E. B., Gupta S. K., McCluskey F. P., Sandborn P. (2010) Integrated product and process design and development–the product realization process, second edition. International Journal of Production Research, 12 (48). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540903482244.

13. Hsin-Hsin Chang (2005) The influence of continuous improvement and performance factors in total quality organization. Total Quality Management, 3 (16): 413–437. 14. Le Moigne J.-L. (1990) La théorie du système général. Théorie de la modélisation. Presses Universitaires de France.